Review



hgf  (Elabscience Biotechnology)


Bioz Verified Symbol Elabscience Biotechnology is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Elabscience Biotechnology manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Elabscience Biotechnology hgf
    Temporal analysis of the BMSC paracrine profile on different scaffolds. (A) Confocal microscopy images from Live/Dead fluorescence staining of BMSCs encapsulated within the PCL/HAp-GelMA/BMSCs scaffold after 1, 3, 5, and 14 d of 3D culture (live cells, green; dead cells, red). (B) The concentrations of key paracrine <t>factors</t> <t>(TGF-β,</t> PGE2, VEGF, <t>HGF,</t> and BMP-2) from BMSCs cultured in different scaffolds, quantified from culture supernatants at day 3 and day 7. (C) Corresponding relative mRNA expression levels of TGFB1, PTGS2, VEGFA, HGF, and BMP-2 in BMSCs at day 3 and day 7, as determined by qPCR analysis. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001; ns: not significant.
    Hgf, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 5 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/hgf/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 5 article reviews
    hgf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    94/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Mesenchymal stromal cells-loaded 3D radially aligned composite scaffold with potentiated paracrine signaling for sequential bone regeneration"

    Article Title: Mesenchymal stromal cells-loaded 3D radially aligned composite scaffold with potentiated paracrine signaling for sequential bone regeneration

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.059

    Temporal analysis of the BMSC paracrine profile on different scaffolds. (A) Confocal microscopy images from Live/Dead fluorescence staining of BMSCs encapsulated within the PCL/HAp-GelMA/BMSCs scaffold after 1, 3, 5, and 14 d of 3D culture (live cells, green; dead cells, red). (B) The concentrations of key paracrine factors (TGF-β, PGE2, VEGF, HGF, and BMP-2) from BMSCs cultured in different scaffolds, quantified from culture supernatants at day 3 and day 7. (C) Corresponding relative mRNA expression levels of TGFB1, PTGS2, VEGFA, HGF, and BMP-2 in BMSCs at day 3 and day 7, as determined by qPCR analysis. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001; ns: not significant.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Temporal analysis of the BMSC paracrine profile on different scaffolds. (A) Confocal microscopy images from Live/Dead fluorescence staining of BMSCs encapsulated within the PCL/HAp-GelMA/BMSCs scaffold after 1, 3, 5, and 14 d of 3D culture (live cells, green; dead cells, red). (B) The concentrations of key paracrine factors (TGF-β, PGE2, VEGF, HGF, and BMP-2) from BMSCs cultured in different scaffolds, quantified from culture supernatants at day 3 and day 7. (C) Corresponding relative mRNA expression levels of TGFB1, PTGS2, VEGFA, HGF, and BMP-2 in BMSCs at day 3 and day 7, as determined by qPCR analysis. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001; ns: not significant.

    Techniques Used: Confocal Microscopy, Fluorescence, Staining, Cell Culture, Expressing



    Similar Products

    96
    ATCC human gingival fibroblasts hgfs
    CCK-8 value of <t>HGFs</t> of Ag-Est816 and PBS at Day 1, 3 and 7. Ag-Est816, nanocomposite of silver nanoparticles and N -acyl-homoserine lactone-lactonase Est816; CCK-8, cell counting Kit-8; HGFs, human gingival <t>fibroblasts;</t> PBS, phosphate-buffered saline (control), ns, P > .05).
    Human Gingival Fibroblasts Hgfs, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human gingival fibroblasts hgfs/product/ATCC
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human gingival fibroblasts hgfs - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH primary hgfs
    CCK-8 value of <t>HGFs</t> of Ag-Est816 and PBS at Day 1, 3 and 7. Ag-Est816, nanocomposite of silver nanoparticles and N -acyl-homoserine lactone-lactonase Est816; CCK-8, cell counting Kit-8; HGFs, human gingival <t>fibroblasts;</t> PBS, phosphate-buffered saline (control), ns, P > .05).
    Primary Hgfs, supplied by CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/primary hgfs/product/CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary hgfs - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Elabscience Biotechnology hgf
    Temporal analysis of the BMSC paracrine profile on different scaffolds. (A) Confocal microscopy images from Live/Dead fluorescence staining of BMSCs encapsulated within the PCL/HAp-GelMA/BMSCs scaffold after 1, 3, 5, and 14 d of 3D culture (live cells, green; dead cells, red). (B) The concentrations of key paracrine <t>factors</t> <t>(TGF-β,</t> PGE2, VEGF, <t>HGF,</t> and BMP-2) from BMSCs cultured in different scaffolds, quantified from culture supernatants at day 3 and day 7. (C) Corresponding relative mRNA expression levels of TGFB1, PTGS2, VEGFA, HGF, and BMP-2 in BMSCs at day 3 and day 7, as determined by qPCR analysis. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001; ns: not significant.
    Hgf, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/hgf/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hgf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    ATCC human gingival fibroblast cell line hgf 1
    Temporal analysis of the BMSC paracrine profile on different scaffolds. (A) Confocal microscopy images from Live/Dead fluorescence staining of BMSCs encapsulated within the PCL/HAp-GelMA/BMSCs scaffold after 1, 3, 5, and 14 d of 3D culture (live cells, green; dead cells, red). (B) The concentrations of key paracrine <t>factors</t> <t>(TGF-β,</t> PGE2, VEGF, <t>HGF,</t> and BMP-2) from BMSCs cultured in different scaffolds, quantified from culture supernatants at day 3 and day 7. (C) Corresponding relative mRNA expression levels of TGFB1, PTGS2, VEGFA, HGF, and BMP-2 in BMSCs at day 3 and day 7, as determined by qPCR analysis. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001; ns: not significant.
    Human Gingival Fibroblast Cell Line Hgf 1, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human gingival fibroblast cell line hgf 1/product/ATCC
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human gingival fibroblast cell line hgf 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Human Protein Atlas hgf
    (a) Schematic illustrating the analytical framework used to identify liver–heart crosstalk mediators by integrating bulk RNA sequencing data and cross-tissue transcript correlation analysis. Liver–heart crosstalk scores (S sec ) calculated using QENIE, which quantifies the aggregate correlation (biweight midcorrelation) between the expression of a liver-expressed secreted protein gene and the global cardiac transcriptome, <t>identify</t> <t>Hgfac</t> as a candidate liver-derived mediator. ( b ) Expression correlation analysis using GD-CAT to assess data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project where tissues were assessed with the expression of HGFAC in liver tissue with a qvalue cutoff of q<0.1. All 310 individuals (across both sexes) were used, and FDR adjustments were calculated using a Benjamini-Hochberg method. ( c ) List of disease and traits associated with HGFAC and <t>HGF</t> genetic variants in humans using PhenoScanner V2.
    Hgf, supplied by Human Protein Atlas, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/hgf/product/Human Protein Atlas
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hgf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Novoprotein hgf
    (a) Schematic illustrating the analytical framework used to identify liver–heart crosstalk mediators by integrating bulk RNA sequencing data and cross-tissue transcript correlation analysis. Liver–heart crosstalk scores (S sec ) calculated using QENIE, which quantifies the aggregate correlation (biweight midcorrelation) between the expression of a liver-expressed secreted protein gene and the global cardiac transcriptome, <t>identify</t> <t>Hgfac</t> as a candidate liver-derived mediator. ( b ) Expression correlation analysis using GD-CAT to assess data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project where tissues were assessed with the expression of HGFAC in liver tissue with a qvalue cutoff of q<0.1. All 310 individuals (across both sexes) were used, and FDR adjustments were calculated using a Benjamini-Hochberg method. ( c ) List of disease and traits associated with HGFAC and <t>HGF</t> genetic variants in humans using PhenoScanner V2.
    Hgf, supplied by Novoprotein, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/hgf/product/Novoprotein
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hgf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    ATCC test formulations
    (a) Schematic illustrating the analytical framework used to identify liver–heart crosstalk mediators by integrating bulk RNA sequencing data and cross-tissue transcript correlation analysis. Liver–heart crosstalk scores (S sec ) calculated using QENIE, which quantifies the aggregate correlation (biweight midcorrelation) between the expression of a liver-expressed secreted protein gene and the global cardiac transcriptome, <t>identify</t> <t>Hgfac</t> as a candidate liver-derived mediator. ( b ) Expression correlation analysis using GD-CAT to assess data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project where tissues were assessed with the expression of HGFAC in liver tissue with a qvalue cutoff of q<0.1. All 310 individuals (across both sexes) were used, and FDR adjustments were calculated using a Benjamini-Hochberg method. ( c ) List of disease and traits associated with HGFAC and <t>HGF</t> genetic variants in humans using PhenoScanner V2.
    Test Formulations, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/test formulations/product/ATCC
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    test formulations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    ATCC hgf 1 cells
    (a) Schematic illustrating the analytical framework used to identify liver–heart crosstalk mediators by integrating bulk RNA sequencing data and cross-tissue transcript correlation analysis. Liver–heart crosstalk scores (S sec ) calculated using QENIE, which quantifies the aggregate correlation (biweight midcorrelation) between the expression of a liver-expressed secreted protein gene and the global cardiac transcriptome, <t>identify</t> <t>Hgfac</t> as a candidate liver-derived mediator. ( b ) Expression correlation analysis using GD-CAT to assess data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project where tissues were assessed with the expression of HGFAC in liver tissue with a qvalue cutoff of q<0.1. All 310 individuals (across both sexes) were used, and FDR adjustments were calculated using a Benjamini-Hochberg method. ( c ) List of disease and traits associated with HGFAC and <t>HGF</t> genetic variants in humans using PhenoScanner V2.
    Hgf 1 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/hgf 1 cells/product/ATCC
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hgf 1 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Cambridge Bioscience recombinant hgf
    (a) Schematic illustrating the analytical framework used to identify liver–heart crosstalk mediators by integrating bulk RNA sequencing data and cross-tissue transcript correlation analysis. Liver–heart crosstalk scores (S sec ) calculated using QENIE, which quantifies the aggregate correlation (biweight midcorrelation) between the expression of a liver-expressed secreted protein gene and the global cardiac transcriptome, <t>identify</t> <t>Hgfac</t> as a candidate liver-derived mediator. ( b ) Expression correlation analysis using GD-CAT to assess data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project where tissues were assessed with the expression of HGFAC in liver tissue with a qvalue cutoff of q<0.1. All 310 individuals (across both sexes) were used, and FDR adjustments were calculated using a Benjamini-Hochberg method. ( c ) List of disease and traits associated with HGFAC and <t>HGF</t> genetic variants in humans using PhenoScanner V2.
    Recombinant Hgf, supplied by Cambridge Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant hgf/product/Cambridge Bioscience
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant hgf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    CCK-8 value of HGFs of Ag-Est816 and PBS at Day 1, 3 and 7. Ag-Est816, nanocomposite of silver nanoparticles and N -acyl-homoserine lactone-lactonase Est816; CCK-8, cell counting Kit-8; HGFs, human gingival fibroblasts; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline (control), ns, P > .05).

    Journal: International Dental Journal

    Article Title: Developing a Silver Nanocomposite With Quorum-Quenching Enzyme Ag-Est816 to Prevent Periodontitis

    doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2026.109481

    Figure Lengend Snippet: CCK-8 value of HGFs of Ag-Est816 and PBS at Day 1, 3 and 7. Ag-Est816, nanocomposite of silver nanoparticles and N -acyl-homoserine lactone-lactonase Est816; CCK-8, cell counting Kit-8; HGFs, human gingival fibroblasts; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline (control), ns, P > .05).

    Article Snippet: The Est816 was prepared and purified according to our established protocols, and its molecular mass was confirmed by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis., , Human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) (HGF-1, ATCC CRL-2014) were used in the following experiments.

    Techniques: CCK-8 Assay, Cell Counting, Saline, Control

    Cytocompatibility of HGFs treated with Ag-Est816 nanocomposite and PBS (control) at Day 1, 3 and 7. Ag-Est816, nanocomposite of silver nanoparticles and N -acyl-homoserine lactone-lactonase Est816; PBS, Phosphate-buffered Saline (Control). Immunofluorescence staining: F‑actin labelled the cytoskeleton in red, DAPI labelled nuclei in blue.

    Journal: International Dental Journal

    Article Title: Developing a Silver Nanocomposite With Quorum-Quenching Enzyme Ag-Est816 to Prevent Periodontitis

    doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2026.109481

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Cytocompatibility of HGFs treated with Ag-Est816 nanocomposite and PBS (control) at Day 1, 3 and 7. Ag-Est816, nanocomposite of silver nanoparticles and N -acyl-homoserine lactone-lactonase Est816; PBS, Phosphate-buffered Saline (Control). Immunofluorescence staining: F‑actin labelled the cytoskeleton in red, DAPI labelled nuclei in blue.

    Article Snippet: The Est816 was prepared and purified according to our established protocols, and its molecular mass was confirmed by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis., , Human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) (HGF-1, ATCC CRL-2014) were used in the following experiments.

    Techniques: Control, Saline, Immunofluorescence, Staining

    Temporal analysis of the BMSC paracrine profile on different scaffolds. (A) Confocal microscopy images from Live/Dead fluorescence staining of BMSCs encapsulated within the PCL/HAp-GelMA/BMSCs scaffold after 1, 3, 5, and 14 d of 3D culture (live cells, green; dead cells, red). (B) The concentrations of key paracrine factors (TGF-β, PGE2, VEGF, HGF, and BMP-2) from BMSCs cultured in different scaffolds, quantified from culture supernatants at day 3 and day 7. (C) Corresponding relative mRNA expression levels of TGFB1, PTGS2, VEGFA, HGF, and BMP-2 in BMSCs at day 3 and day 7, as determined by qPCR analysis. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001; ns: not significant.

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Mesenchymal stromal cells-loaded 3D radially aligned composite scaffold with potentiated paracrine signaling for sequential bone regeneration

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.059

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Temporal analysis of the BMSC paracrine profile on different scaffolds. (A) Confocal microscopy images from Live/Dead fluorescence staining of BMSCs encapsulated within the PCL/HAp-GelMA/BMSCs scaffold after 1, 3, 5, and 14 d of 3D culture (live cells, green; dead cells, red). (B) The concentrations of key paracrine factors (TGF-β, PGE2, VEGF, HGF, and BMP-2) from BMSCs cultured in different scaffolds, quantified from culture supernatants at day 3 and day 7. (C) Corresponding relative mRNA expression levels of TGFB1, PTGS2, VEGFA, HGF, and BMP-2 in BMSCs at day 3 and day 7, as determined by qPCR analysis. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001; ns: not significant.

    Article Snippet: ELISA kits for PGE2 (Cat. No. E-EL-0034), TGF-β (Cat. No. E-EL-0162), VEGF (Cat. No. E-EL-R2603), and HGF (Cat. No. E-EL-R0496) were purchased from Elabscience (Wuhan, China).

    Techniques: Confocal Microscopy, Fluorescence, Staining, Cell Culture, Expressing

    (a) Schematic illustrating the analytical framework used to identify liver–heart crosstalk mediators by integrating bulk RNA sequencing data and cross-tissue transcript correlation analysis. Liver–heart crosstalk scores (S sec ) calculated using QENIE, which quantifies the aggregate correlation (biweight midcorrelation) between the expression of a liver-expressed secreted protein gene and the global cardiac transcriptome, identify Hgfac as a candidate liver-derived mediator. ( b ) Expression correlation analysis using GD-CAT to assess data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project where tissues were assessed with the expression of HGFAC in liver tissue with a qvalue cutoff of q<0.1. All 310 individuals (across both sexes) were used, and FDR adjustments were calculated using a Benjamini-Hochberg method. ( c ) List of disease and traits associated with HGFAC and HGF genetic variants in humans using PhenoScanner V2.

    Journal: medRxiv

    Article Title: A liver-heart endocrine axis revealed by systems genetics and mediated by hepatocyte growth factor activator

    doi: 10.64898/2026.05.05.26352474

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) Schematic illustrating the analytical framework used to identify liver–heart crosstalk mediators by integrating bulk RNA sequencing data and cross-tissue transcript correlation analysis. Liver–heart crosstalk scores (S sec ) calculated using QENIE, which quantifies the aggregate correlation (biweight midcorrelation) between the expression of a liver-expressed secreted protein gene and the global cardiac transcriptome, identify Hgfac as a candidate liver-derived mediator. ( b ) Expression correlation analysis using GD-CAT to assess data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project where tissues were assessed with the expression of HGFAC in liver tissue with a qvalue cutoff of q<0.1. All 310 individuals (across both sexes) were used, and FDR adjustments were calculated using a Benjamini-Hochberg method. ( c ) List of disease and traits associated with HGFAC and HGF genetic variants in humans using PhenoScanner V2.

    Article Snippet: Expression across tissues from The Human Protein Atlas for ( a and b ) HGFAC , ( c ) HGF , and ( d ) MET reported as normalized protein-coding transcripts per million (nTPM). medrxiv;2026.05.05.26352474v1/FIGS2 F6 figs2 Extended Data Fig. 2.

    Techniques: RNA Sequencing, Expressing, Derivative Assay

    Levels of ( a ) HGFAC and ( b ) HGF were measured in the UK Biobank cohort at baseline (n = 37,055) on the Olink platform. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate quintiles of serum HGFAC and HGF protein levels with cumulative incidence of HF with adjustment for age, sex, self-reported ethnicity, BMI, LDL, HDL, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, lipid-lowering medications, and anti-hypertension medications. Forest plots indicating the odds of HFpEF in Cleveland cohort (n = 406) by ( c ) HGFAC and ( d ) HGF tertiles from plasma samples assayed by ELISA. Multivariable logistic regression model for odds ratio included adjustments for age, sex, current smoking, SBP, DM, dyslipidemia (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≤40 mg/dL, or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol≥130 mg/dL or triglycerides≥150 mg/dL), symbols represent odds ratios, and the 95% confidence interval is indicated by line length.

    Journal: medRxiv

    Article Title: A liver-heart endocrine axis revealed by systems genetics and mediated by hepatocyte growth factor activator

    doi: 10.64898/2026.05.05.26352474

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Levels of ( a ) HGFAC and ( b ) HGF were measured in the UK Biobank cohort at baseline (n = 37,055) on the Olink platform. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate quintiles of serum HGFAC and HGF protein levels with cumulative incidence of HF with adjustment for age, sex, self-reported ethnicity, BMI, LDL, HDL, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, lipid-lowering medications, and anti-hypertension medications. Forest plots indicating the odds of HFpEF in Cleveland cohort (n = 406) by ( c ) HGFAC and ( d ) HGF tertiles from plasma samples assayed by ELISA. Multivariable logistic regression model for odds ratio included adjustments for age, sex, current smoking, SBP, DM, dyslipidemia (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≤40 mg/dL, or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol≥130 mg/dL or triglycerides≥150 mg/dL), symbols represent odds ratios, and the 95% confidence interval is indicated by line length.

    Article Snippet: Expression across tissues from The Human Protein Atlas for ( a and b ) HGFAC , ( c ) HGF , and ( d ) MET reported as normalized protein-coding transcripts per million (nTPM). medrxiv;2026.05.05.26352474v1/FIGS2 F6 figs2 Extended Data Fig. 2.

    Techniques: Medications, Clinical Proteomics, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay